Would anyone trust a restaurant critic if they didn't even eat the food they're reviewing? At least the kiss ass tries the product. Both are biased, but only one usually plays the game at all. I think metacritic user score is probably still the most accurate score overall.Īlmost no game in my mind deservers a 0/10 or 10/10.Here is the big difference between the two though. If everything is a masterpiece, then nothing is. They literally give 10-20 games a year a 10/10 rating. Sadly most of the game journalists love to positively review bomb games. Usually they cancel each other out pretty well.Īlmost no game in my mind deservers a 0/10 or 10/10.ġ0 out of 10 should be reserved for absolute masterpiece type of games, which come out maybe once every 4-5 years. There is "positive" review bombing with superfans giving every mediocre game 10/10.Īnd there is "negative" review bombing, with hater and trolls giving games 0/10. The review bombing always works both ways. But people who say the user review scores are more accurate would have failed the autism test as kids if they were given the test. Conflict of interest with them being reliant on publishers while having to review them. Like, I get being sceptical of game sites reviewing it since they have their own problems. So many people form their opinions off adverse reactions to others. Yes, so accurate they review bombs games before they come out and metacritic had to put a policy in place just to stop people from doing it. Not only for games, but also for movies and tv shows. Oprindeligt skrevet af BlackSunEmpire:Most of the time I find the metacritic user review score much more accurate, than the critics score.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |